×

La venta termina hoyObtenga un 30% de descuento en cualquier curso (excepto paquetes)

Termina en --- --- ---

Two CAM sensors - 2 core, 3 core or 4 core shielded?

Cableado práctico para deportes de motor - Nivel Club

Publicaciones del foro

Cursos

Blog

Artículos técnicos

Discusión y preguntas relacionadas con el curso Cableado práctico de deportes de motor - Nivel Club

= Hilos resueltos

Autor
864 Vistas

Hi everyone,

Starting work on a 1UZ engine loom at the moment. I'm trying to reduce any bulk in the loom and also be efficient with the pin count on the firewall plug.

Ultimately I'd like to use a 3-core shielded cable for the two cam sensors, splitting out into short lengths close to the sensors. (Cam 1, Cam 2, shared sensGND). Is this acceptable? or is 4 core required? (Cam 1, Cam 2, sensGND 1, sensGND).

I'd also like to do the same with the two knock sensors.

I would've originally done it with multiple 2-core cables, but that costs more and adds weight/bulk.

Cheers!

It is indeed more costly and more of a hassle, but because of the risk of cross-triggering from inductive affects I'd suggest a minimum of 4 wire, shielded.

Preferably 2 separate 2 wire runs.

You may be fine with a 3 wire with a common ground, but why take the gamble for a few dollars.

I say try it as see. But be prepared to completely replace it if necessary due to issues you can't resolve. I bet it will work fine.

Thanks for the feedback. I realised that I won't need to use both cam sensors anyway so I can stick the usual twin core for this one.

Generalmente respondemos dentro de las 12 horas (a menudo antes)

¿Necesitar ayuda?

¿Necesitas ayuda para elegir un curso?

¿Tiene dificultades con el sitio web?

¿O necesita contactarnos por cualquier otro motivo?