Forum » CANBus Communications Decoded » Highest sensor sample rate for AIM Evo4s CAN receiver

Highest sensor sample rate for AIM Evo4s CAN receiver

CANBus Communications Decoded

Forum Posts



Tech Articles

Discussion and questions related to the course CAN Bus Communications Decoded

= Resolved threads

Page 1

First up, thanks for the great courses here! I have a lot of experience working with sensors and data in the mountain bike world, but as a total newbie to the motorsport world the courses I have done so far have been a huge head start.

The question I have is I want to use a CAN network to expand the number of sensors on my Aim EVO4s data logger, but several of these use very high sample rates of 500Hz+. An initial poke around the RS3 CAN protocol builder only has a max sample frequency of 100Hz, so will this be possible with the Aim logger? Or am I better off leaving those sensors directly on the Analog input (with its max. rate of 1000Hz) and just use the CAN bus for slower sample rates?

Examples of sensors-

Suspension position potentiometers (1000Hz)

Accelerometers (frame + wheel hubs, 500Hz)

Temperature (thermocouples and/or IR for brakes and suspension)

Strain gauges/load cells

Pressure sensors (brake lines, tyres)

As an Aim dealer, I will tell you to connect the sensors to the EVO4S logger -- all their CAN expansion module have a 100hz max sampling rate, and as you've discovered the Custom CAN protocol editor limits you to a 100hz sampling rate.

Now there are other systems with more flexible CAN support such as MoTeC which will handle CAN data broadcast at 1ms (1000hz samples/sec).

Thanks David that pretty much solves it for me. The plan is to attempt to build a custom expansion module, which may or may not be able reach higher sample rates but with the logger being the choke point anyway I can definitely save myself some stress there!

I'm tied to the Aim logger for the time being - I barely new what CAN was when I purchased it, let alone that it might be something I would end up using so never looked in to it while doing research! Good to know Motec is better in that regard though, I do like their software as well