Sale ends todayGet 30% off any course (excluding packages)

Ends in --- --- ---

Question from first time engine builder about crank journals and piston gaps

General Engine Building Discussion

Forum Posts



Tech Articles

Talk about engine building here. New products, tricky questions or showcase your work - If it's engine building related it's welcome here.

= Resolved threads


I had some machine work done recently which included polishing my crank journals for my Mazda B6 engine. When I tore down the engine I measured crank journal clearances at around 0.025mm (using platigauge), but I don't know the early history of the engine so I'm not sure what size bearings it had (can I tell from the thickness of the bearing?

I started assembling this past weekend and when I assembled the polished crank I measured clearances at around 0.050mm with STD ACL bearings. The Mazda service manual states that spec is 0.018-0.036mm and maximum 0.1mm. So I'm wondering if that's acceptable, or if I should get the crank re-ground to accept undersize bearings?

The other thing that I found is that my ring gaps (factory Mazda) are all slightly large at about .33mm for top (spec is 0.15-0.30), .43 for second (0.15-0.30). I've read/heard that ring gaps that are larger are generally preferred to smaller. But is it worth looking at different sized rings?

It's not a high power build or anything, just something of an improved stock build where I'm going slightly higher compression (by virtue of a conservative head shave of 20 thou and a 1mm (vs 1.5mm) head gasket), but down the line will run ITB's, cams and a more aggressive tune. Or something like that. But main aim here is to have a relatively bulletproof weekend driver; it's not a daily but it when it's driven it's generally driven pretty hard.

Thankyou :)

That's approximately 0.002", which should be fine - Japanese manufacturers tent to run clearances a little on the tight side. For future regference, OEM shells will usually be stamped "STD", or have code letters on them, oversized will be marked -0.25 or -0.010, or similar.

With the rings, it's common for the rings to be a little on the wide side, sometimes called "jobber" rings, because it's much cheaper and easier for simple rebuilding than having to resize each ring. There may also be a little bore wear, if just re-ringing, with 1 thou' of wear increasing the gap by just over 3 thou' - because of this it's a good idea to check the gap at the bottom of the bore, as sometimes you may have the clearance at the top of the bore, but not the bottom. I have seen several tests and reports that there's negligible difference until the gap reaches around 0.050", or 1.25mm - of course, the wider gaps will wear to that point more quickly, but still may take a few hundreds of thousand kms.

We usually reply within 12hrs (often sooner)

Need Help?

Need help choosing a course?

Experiencing website difficulties?

Or need to contact us for any other reason?