Haltech R5 - Rotary N/A Peripheral Port - Ai Assisted.

I am experimenting with advanced Ai models.

I have a Haltech R5 and i'm attempting to utilise it as a full Engine Management / PDM.

Boomslang and Tuned By Shawn both offer looms for the RX8 but from what i can find, no one offers a full loom that replaces the factory ECU and Fuse Box.

I have ordered used looms to harvest for connectors.

Ai is assisting with the wiring, i've built an Ai model with all the required data from Mazda and Haltech to design a wiring loom.

Ai has also matched this loom with pinouts with the Haltech R5.

To expand on this further Ai is helping to configure a base map, I have given it access to Haltech official rotary base maps, i have uploaded data of all the sensors and injectors, coil packs, spark plugs, crank position sensors etc.

Imagine Ai as Johnny 5, "I need input..." Ai is mathematical and excels with data, in theory if you build the Ai model with all the correct data, it should be able to help analyse that data and use the data to asist in providing correct data back.

What Ai can't do, it currently can not access an ECU, neither can it build a tune for you from scratch in it's environment. But it can provide information from what i can tell is correct based on Haltech and Mazda legitimate sources. What it has demonstrated is it understands the Haltech NSP software to an extent it can give clear instructions.

It can also make sensible suggestions, i already had a variety of sensors, based on what was advised by Ai by analysing my unique engine, i have doubled down and ordered additional sensors.

If i was to upload the base map, would someone be able to look at it and suggest if it's safe to use as a base map?

I'm cautious posting this thread because although i think it's very interesting and an advancement in technology some people will call out skynet and madness.

It's certainly a interesting technology to embrace for when it gets to a point to be tested and proven, to tune a car based on real time logs sent from the ecu. This is coming, perhaps within the next 2 years.

I think the best way to consider this is, a dyno tune vs a remote tune where log files are emailed back n fourth.

AI is a fantastic tool and I think this will be fun to watch develop in the future.

It can definitely save time and potentially help people but if it is purely a LLM and has no genuine mathematical elements you need to be very care regards all your triggering, injector and mapping data as at the end of the day LLMs are effectively just plaigerism probability machines. The newer the system you are using it for, with good OEM website/manuals and minimal forum or 3rd party "knowledge" is probably best in that case of not feeding you spurious data. If you are buying a loom from Shaun he may be happy to look over your map.

I assume you may be using fuel pressure, fuel temperature, oil pressure, intake manifold pressure,exhaust manifold pressure (if considering turbo in future), and maybe a 2 or 4 channel EGT thermocouple set? In addition to or adopting factory sensors?